Canon G7X Mark II – A Sufficient Camera
October 9th, 2017
For many years I’ve carried a Canon S90 compact camera on my belt. It’s a good camera and I’ve made some good photos with it, but it is pretty limited. Push it much beyond ideal photo conditions and the files start to fall apart. But it was always there on my belt, so I had it when I needed it.
Recently the S90 was showing signs that it was approaching the end of its life, so I started looking around for a replacement. I ended up buying a Canon G7X Mark II. This new camera has completely changed the way I think about the camera on my belt.
If you aren’t familiar with the G7X Mark II, its lens is a 35mm-equivalent of 24-100mm with aperture of 1.8-2.8 across the zoom range. Both those characteristics are a huge improvement over the S90. Add to that the 20MP one-inch sensor and I figured I’d get a significant improvement in image quality.
Turns out “significant improvement” was a major understatement.
Just a small sample of the image quality. Full frame above, small cropped area of the same photo below.
Taken at one of the last performances of the Barnum and Bailey Circus.
100mm-e at 1/200, f/2.8 (wide open), ISO 400
I’ve been a Nikon guy since 1968, but recently bought a Panasonic GX8 and thought it was pretty much my ideal camera. I’ve put together a small system that exceeds the range of my Nikon system and spent less on it than new a Nikon and one good lens would cost. I was pretty happy and not planning to make many equipment changes.
Well, it didn’t take long to realize that the files I was getting from the new Canon were pretty much equal to those coming out of the Panasonic. And the Canon had faster maximum apertures than any of my Micro 4/3 lenses.
I’ve been shooting with both cameras for a few months now, including a driving trip across the country along Rt. 66, with visits to Death Valley, Los Angeles and Yosemite. In quite a few instances the Canon G7X files are as good as or better than the files from the Panasonic GX8.
Blue Swallow Motel, perhaps the most famous of the old Rt. 66 motels, Tucumcari, New Mexico. 24mm-e, 1/30, f/2.5, ISO 125.
There are limitations to the Canon. There’s no viewfinder. There’s no hot shoe or PC outlet. And, of course, you can’t change the lens. It won’t do everything. But it seems to be able to handle at least 90 percent…maybe 95 percent…of the photos I take. And it fits in a pouch on my belt. It will easily go in a large pocket.
One of the murals in the Amargosa Hotel and Opera House in Death Valley Junction, California.
The murals were painted by the late Marta Becket who bought the motel in the 1960s and regularly performed in the Opera House.
24mm-e, 1/20, f/1.8 (wide open), ISO 1600.
I’ve printed this file 17×22 and it looks fine at that size.
It’s a well built camera. It feels substantial in my hand. The surface offers a good grip and there is a finger grip on the right side that is pretty much perfect. (I used an add-on aftermarket grip on the S90.) It took me a while to get used to the touch screen controls on the G7X, but once I understood them, it made controlling the camera quick and easy. In addition, there’s a control ring around the lens that can be customized. I have it set to control aperture or shutter when I put the camera in aperture or shutter priority mode.
Amargosa Hotel and Opera House in Death Valley Junction, California. 1/60, f/3.9, ISO 400.
It was shot at 18mm…I tried to do the math to get the 35mm-e for that, but it hurt my head, so I stopped. I was told there would be no math.
I’ve made some 17×22 prints to see how they look. They are just fine. Even files shot at 1600 ISO print fine at that size and the “grain” or noise that is visible is much less than the grain from 35mm Tri-X at 400 ISO. That’s my standard: Is it better than 35mm film? The files from this little camera definitely are better than 35mm. For most of my life as a photographer I shot with 35mm cameras because the results were good enough and 35mm cameras fit my style of shooting. I’ve worked with medium format and view cameras, including 8×10, when larger negatives were needed for jobs, but 35mm was always what I preferred.
Half Dome, Yosemite National Park. 100mm-e, 1/1250, f/4.5, ISO 125. I’ve printed this file 17×22 and it looks fine at that size.
As great as the files are, I do know that there are compromises in the design of the lens. There is a lot of correction being done by software. I’ve looked at the RAW files with no software correction and the optical flaws are pretty extreme. But the lens is sharp and the software corrections don’t seem to hurt the sharpness. So, it’s good enough…it’s sufficient.
My friend, Gina, at 24mm-e with no software adjustments above.
The wide end of the zoom range has the most distortion.
The distortion is automatically corrected in camera for jpegs and in the RAW conversion software for RAW files.
The corrected version below. The lens is sharp and the files hold up well through the software conversion.
In June I visited Peru and went to Machu Picchu, Cusco, and the Nasca Lines among other places.
Machu Picchu
The G7X Mark II was the only camera I took on that trip. And it performed perfectly. It was great to not have to drag a camera bag or backpack through security, or stash it in a cramped airplane cabin. I didn’t have to carry a camera bag everywhere and worry about what to do with it, or if it made me a target for thieves.
Machu Picchu
I never really felt the need for more camera than the G7X provided. It even performed very well doing aerial photos of the Nasca Lines. I think we are all going to be working with cameras like this in the near future. The reasons for the big heavy case full of equipment are becoming fewer and fewer.
The Hummingbird from the air, Nasca Lines, Peru
At a parade in Cusco, Peru
I do have one major complaint for Canon, though. For all those years with the S90 I used their little leather belt case, PSC-900, for the camera. It’s perfect. Small and secure. The magnetic catch keeps it closed, but opens and closes easily with no noise. It provides good protection, yet the camera is instantly accessible. I wore one out and replaced it with the same case.
So I bought the similar case for the G7X Mark II. I don’t understand how, after designing a perfect case for the S90, Canon managed to design a case for the G7X Mark II that fails at every point where the S90 case excels. The Canon PSC-5500 is much larger than it needs to be. Instead of closing closely over the top of the camera, it makes a large loop across the top. This loop catches on things constantly, pulling the case open. The magnetic catch is not secure, is hard to get latched, and comes unlatched all the time, even when it hasn’t caught on something. This case is a total failure. And it is also grossly overpriced.
The new awful, useless, overpriced case for the G7X Mark II on the left.
The old perfect case for the S90 on the right.
I used the Canon case for a month or so and couldn’t stand it anymore. I replaced it with a Case Logic TBC-403 case that fits the camera perfectly, is much smaller on my belt, and even has room for a spare battery and memory card. And it costs about 1/5 what Canon charges for their failure of a case. My main complaint about the Case Logic case is the zipper closure which makes it a bit slower to get the camera in and out. But, still, it’s a huge improvement over the Canon case.
Left to right: The old S90 case, the new G7X Mark II case, and the reasonably priced and adequate Case Logic case.
Still wishing I had something like the old S90 case I noticed that Canon has a case for the older, original G7X, the PSC-5300. It looked very similar to the old S90 case. But it wasn’t listed as fitting the G7X Mark II. Customer support at one of the major internet camera stores told me that the Mark II would not fit in this case. But after struggling with the zipper on the Case Logic case a few times I decided to take a chance and ordered the PSC-5300.
Here’s the Canon PSC-5300 case that I’m using for my G7X Mark II despite being told it would not fit.
Below you can see my camera in the case. Fits just fine.
Happily, the G7X Mark II does fit just fine. It’s only slightly larger than the older camera, mostly because of the grip on the front. But it fits snugly in this case. The case closes and stays closed with the magnetic catches and opens effortlessly and silently. There’s nowhere to store a spare card and battery, but those can go in any pocket, so that’s a minor thing. I’m now very happy with both my G7X Mark II and the case I’m carrying it in.
Unfortunately it appears that Canon has discontinued the PSC-5300 case. That is very sad. It is the best case for the G7X Mark II. Maybe they will bring it back if enough people complain. Or maybe there are some used ones out there if you search. I’m glad I got mine before it was too late.
A Couple More Gallery Shows
October 8th, 2017
I have work in two gallery shows coming up. The galleries are located at opposite sides of the country.
The photo above will be in the show, “Fairy Tales & Nuclear Bombs (What Happened to the Summer of Love)”, at the LightBox Photographic Gallery in Astoria, Oregon. The exhibit will run October 14 to November 7.
And this one, above, will be in the show, “The Intimate Portrait” juried by Joyce Tenneson, at the SE Center for Photography in Greenville, South Carolina. That show will be up November 3-26.
Both shows look to be well worth your time to see if you are in one of those areas.
A Show In Vermont
September 19th, 2017
The photo above, featuring four of my favorite models on the rocky coast of Maine, is in the current show, “Multiples,” at the Darkroom Gallery in Essex Junction, Vermont.
The artists reception for this show will be this Saturday, September 23. I plan to attend that reception. So, if you are in the Burlington area, please stop by and say hello.
The Darkroom Gallery is my favorite place to show my work. I’ve been in quite a few shows there, so many that they have me on their “Darkroom Gallery Masters” list. They have even sold my prints from past shows.
But, the gallery has announced that they are taking a break after 99 shows. They plan to be back next year with more shows. I’m going up to encourage them to come back. I’ll be looking forward to what they do in 2018.
Ayn of Ties
September 14th, 2017
Back when I still had my studio Ayn wanted to do a shoot with a bunch of ties. What Ayn wants, Ayn gets, as far as I’m concerned. So this is what we came up with.
That’s right, folks, Ayn didn’t even get naked for this shoot. I hope you aren’t too disappointed.
After we shot the ties I was playing around with one of my Micro 4/3 Panasonic cameras. (The studio lit photos were done with my Nikon D7000.) It was too dark over in the corner where Ayn was getting her things ready, but I snapped a couple frames anyway because I liked the way the light looked. This was a one-second exposure. I like all the stuff that happened when I hand-held the camera for that long.
I did another shot where the shutter speed was just a bit shorter and got this more “normal” result. But I like the “flawed” photo better.
Gallery Show
September 9th, 2017
I’ve received word that this photograph of Rachel up in Maine has been chosen for the upcoming show at the South East Center for Photography in Greenville, South Carolina. The show theme is “The Intimate Portrait.” I’m particularly happy about this for a couple reasons. One is that I’ve been wanting to get my work in a show at this gallery for some time. The other is that the juror for this show was Joyce Tenneson. I’m quite pleased that she found one of my photos to be worthy of inclusion in this show.
The show opens on November 3. If you live in the Greenville, SC area, please go take a look at the show.
New Toy
September 2nd, 2017
Finally! An Instax Mini camera with a sharp lens and full manual control and focusing. Thanks to Instantoptions.com. I’ll be playing around with this and will report on how it goes.
Still Alive
August 30th, 2017
Sorry for not posting for so long. Seems like I’ve been on the road all summer. I’ll get back to it soon.
Meanwhile, here a few headshots I did of my good friend and model Ayn.
More From the Desert
July 30th, 2017
Near Salvation Mountain is a fairly strange community known as Slab City. And in Slab City is a fairly strange art community known as East Jesus.
So, after visiting Salvation Mountain we headed on over to East Jesus and I couldn’t resist taking a few photos there.
Photos from the Left Coast
July 28th, 2017
Well, not exactly at the coast. I’ve been traveling. That’s why I haven’t been posting here. I went to the desert in Southern California. Thought I’d share a few of my photos from there. That’s a pretty well known, often photographed abandoned gas station at the Salton Sea above. I couldn’t resist doing my own photo.
This old boat just waiting for someone to restore it is parked at Bombay Beach right by the water.
Pelicans at Bombay Beach. According to Wikipedia Bombay Beach is the lowest community in America, located 223 feet below sea level.
So I guess that would make this the lowest American Legion Post in America.
Go a little south of the Salton Sea and you just might find Salvation Mountain. It’s a pretty amazing piece of American religious art that is worth visiting.
Sadly, the creator has gone to meet his creator a few years ago. Volunteers seem to be maintaining the place now, but I wonder how long it will last now that the man inspired to create it is no longer there. Better go see it soon.
That’s all for now. I’ll be back soon.
More Friend Photos
July 20th, 2017
I took my lovely friend to my studio for a few more photos.
I’ve always loved simple window light, so we worked a bit with that.
And we played around a bit with studio flash lighting.
But mostly it was just a time for making photos of a lovely woman.
