Canon G7X Mark II – A Sufficient Camera

October 9th, 2017

Levingston2 400x248 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

For many years I’ve carried a Canon S90 compact camera on my belt. It’s a good camera and I’ve made some good photos with it, but it is pretty limited. Push it much beyond ideal photo conditions and the files start to fall apart. But it was always there on my belt, so I had it when I needed it.

Recently the S90 was showing signs that it was approaching the end of its life, so I started looking around for a replacement. I ended up buying a Canon G7X Mark II. This new camera has completely changed the way I think about the camera on my belt.

If you aren’t familiar with the G7X Mark II, its lens is a 35mm-equivalent of 24-100mm with aperture of 1.8-2.8 across the zoom range. Both those characteristics are a huge improvement over the S90. Add to that the 20MP one-inch sensor and I figured I’d get a significant improvement in image quality.

Turns out “significant improvement” was a major understatement.

Levingston8a 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Just a small sample of the image quality. Full frame above, small cropped area of the same photo below.

Taken at one of the last performances of the Barnum and Bailey Circus.

100mm-e at 1/200, f/2.8 (wide open), ISO 400

Levingston8b 400x518 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

I’ve been a Nikon guy since 1968, but recently bought a Panasonic GX8 and thought it was pretty much my ideal camera. I’ve put together a small system that exceeds the range of my Nikon system and spent less on it than new a Nikon and one good lens would cost. I was pretty happy and not planning to make many equipment changes.

Well, it didn’t take long to realize that the files I was getting from the new Canon were pretty much equal to those coming out of the Panasonic. And the Canon had faster maximum apertures than any of my Micro 4/3 lenses.

I’ve been shooting with both cameras for a few months now, including a driving trip across the country along Rt. 66, with visits to Death Valley, Los Angeles and Yosemite. In quite a few instances the Canon G7X files are as good as or better than the files from the Panasonic GX8.

Levingston10 400x278 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Blue Swallow Motel, perhaps the most famous of the old Rt. 66 motels, Tucumcari, New Mexico. 24mm-e, 1/30, f/2.5, ISO 125.

There are limitations to the Canon. There’s no viewfinder. There’s no hot shoe or PC outlet. And, of course, you can’t change the lens. It won’t do everything. But it seems to be able to handle at least 90 percent…maybe 95 percent…of the photos I take. And it fits in a pouch on my belt. It will easily go in a large pocket.

Levingston11 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

One of the murals in the Amargosa Hotel and Opera House in Death Valley Junction, California.

The murals were painted by the late Marta Becket who bought the motel in the 1960s and regularly performed in the Opera House.

24mm-e, 1/20, f/1.8 (wide open), ISO 1600.

I’ve printed this file 17×22 and it looks fine at that size.

It’s a well built camera. It feels substantial in my hand. The surface offers a good grip and there is a finger grip on the right side that is pretty much perfect. (I used an add-on aftermarket grip on the S90.)  It took me a while to get used to the touch screen controls on the G7X, but once I understood them, it made controlling the camera quick and easy. In addition, there’s a control ring around the lens that can be customized. I have it set to control aperture or shutter when I put the camera in aperture or shutter priority mode.

Levingston14 400x300 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Amargosa Hotel and Opera House in Death Valley Junction, California. 1/60, f/3.9, ISO 400.

It was shot at 18mm…I tried to do the math to get the 35mm-e for that, but it hurt my head, so I stopped. I was told there would be no math.

I’ve made some 17×22 prints to see how they look. They are just fine. Even files shot at 1600 ISO print fine at that size and the “grain” or noise that is visible is much less than the grain from 35mm Tri-X at 400 ISO. That’s my standard: Is it better than 35mm film? The files from this little camera definitely are better than 35mm. For most of my life as a photographer I shot with 35mm cameras because the results were good enough and 35mm cameras fit my style of shooting. I’ve worked with medium format and view cameras, including 8×10, when larger negatives were needed for jobs, but 35mm was always what I preferred.

Levingston13 400x600 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Half Dome, Yosemite National Park. 100mm-e, 1/1250, f/4.5, ISO 125. I’ve printed this file 17×22 and it looks fine at that size.

As great as the files are, I do know that there are compromises in the design of the lens. There is a lot of correction being done by software. I’ve looked at the RAW files with no software correction and the optical flaws are pretty extreme. But the lens is sharp and the software corrections don’t seem to hurt the sharpness. So, it’s good enough…it’s sufficient.

Levingston15a 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

My friend, Gina, at 24mm-e with no software adjustments above.

The wide end of the zoom range has the most distortion.

The distortion is automatically corrected in camera for jpegs and in the RAW conversion software for RAW files.

The corrected version below. The lens is sharp and the files hold up well through the software conversion. 

Levingston15b 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

In June I visited Peru and went to Machu Picchu, Cusco, and the Nasca Lines among other places.

Levingston18 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Machu Picchu

The G7X Mark II was the only camera I took on that trip. And it performed perfectly. It was great to not have to drag a camera bag or backpack through security, or stash it in a cramped airplane cabin. I didn’t have to carry a camera bag everywhere and worry about what to do with it, or if it made me a target for thieves.

Levingston23 400x236 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Machu Picchu

Levingston24 400x600 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

I never really felt the need for more camera than the G7X provided. It even performed very well doing aerial photos of the Nasca Lines. I think we are all going to be working with cameras like this in the near future. The reasons for the big heavy case full of equipment are becoming fewer and fewer.

Levingston19 400x294 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

The Hummingbird from the air, Nasca Lines, Peru

Levingston22 400x267 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

At a parade in Cusco, Peru

I do have one major complaint for Canon, though. For all those years with the S90 I used their little leather belt case, PSC-900, for the camera. It’s perfect. Small and secure. The magnetic catch keeps it closed, but opens and closes easily with no noise. It provides good protection, yet the camera is instantly accessible. I wore one out and replaced it with the same case.

So I bought the similar case for the G7X Mark II. I don’t understand how, after designing a perfect case for the S90, Canon managed to design a case for the G7X Mark II that fails at every point where the S90 case excels. The Canon PSC-5500 is much larger than it needs to be. Instead of closing closely over the top of the camera, it makes a large loop across the top. This loop catches on things constantly, pulling the case open. The magnetic catch is not secure, is hard to get latched, and comes unlatched all the time, even when it hasn’t caught on something. This case is a total failure. And it is also grossly overpriced.

 

Levingston5 400x200 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

The new awful, useless, overpriced case for the G7X Mark II on the left.

The old perfect case for the S90 on the right.

I used the Canon case for a month or so and couldn’t stand it anymore. I replaced it with a Case Logic TBC-403 case that fits the camera perfectly, is much smaller on my belt, and even has room for a spare battery and memory card. And it costs about 1/5 what Canon charges for their failure of a case. My main complaint about the Case Logic case is the zipper closure which makes it a bit slower to get the camera in and out. But, still, it’s a huge improvement over the Canon case.

Levingston3 400x132 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Left to right: The old S90 case, the new G7X Mark II case, and the reasonably priced and adequate Case Logic case.

Still wishing I had something like the old S90 case I noticed that Canon has a case for the older, original G7X, the PSC-5300. It looked very similar to the old S90 case. But it wasn’t listed as fitting the G7X Mark II. Customer support at one of the major internet camera stores told me that the Mark II would not fit in this case. But after struggling with the zipper on the Case Logic case a few times I decided to take a chance and ordered the PSC-5300.

Levingston16 400x326 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Here’s the Canon PSC-5300 case that I’m using for my G7X Mark II despite being told it would not fit.

Below you can see my camera in the case. Fits just fine.

Levingston17 400x363 Canon G7X Mark II   A Sufficient Camera

Happily, the G7X Mark II does fit just fine. It’s only slightly larger than the older camera, mostly because of the grip on the front. But it fits snugly in this case. The case closes and stays closed with the magnetic catches and opens effortlessly and silently. There’s nowhere to store a spare card and battery, but those can go in any pocket, so that’s a minor thing. I’m now very happy with both my G7X Mark II and the case I’m carrying it in.

Unfortunately it appears that Canon has discontinued the PSC-5300 case. That is very sad. It is the best case for the G7X Mark II. Maybe they will bring it back if enough people complain. Or maybe there are some used ones out there if you search. I’m glad I got mine before it was too late.

 

Canon G7X Mark II, Canon G7X Mark II Review, Review | Comments | Trackback

Leave a Reply

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
You can keep track of new comments to this post with the comments feed.

About this Blog

Photos and comments by Dave Levingston. This is the place to see my most recent work which may include nudes, dance, landscape, nature and whatever other kinds of photos I feel like taking.

Since it does contain nude photos, this blog is not intended for viewing by anyone under the age of 18.

All photographs and written comments on this blog are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.

Order A Calendar

2018 Calendars Figure in Nature 2018


2009 ARTS FOR HUMANITY AWARD

Presented by Carrie Leigh's NUDE Magazine. Award design by Lin and Rich of fluffytek and A. J. Kahn.

2008 GOLDEN FLUFFY
Best Blog Image of the Year

About Dave

Photo by Katherine Villari

Dave on the Web

Blogroll

Search Archives

October 2017
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Tags

Categories