More Gaea

February 9th, 2007

Here’s another of Gaea from our shoot earlier this week. In a couple hours I’ll head out for Detroit and the Dirty Show opening tonight. Should be a hoot.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

Gaining Ground

February 8th, 2007

I’m making some headway in getting all the things done that need to be done. I leave tomorrow for Detroit to experience the opening of the Dirty Show tomorrow night. Should be interesting. Don’t know how well I or my work will fit in to that venue, but I’m looking forward to meeting some new people and watching what goes on.

This is Gaea from our shoot earlier this week. She is the model in my photo that will be displayed at the Dirty Show. Gaea and her boyfriend will also be attending the opening with me. I’ll post more from this shoot when I get back from Detroit.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

Busy, busy, busy

February 7th, 2007

Today’s X-ray went well. The sun is out and the roads are getting to be a little more passable. But I’m still swamped with stuff I have to get done. The magazine loved the photos I did for them on Monday…so much that they came right back with a new assignment…so now I have to find 2-5 beautiful teen models with long hair in great shape for a shoot about hair styles. And I’ll be heading back up to Detroit on Friday for the opening of the Dirty Show. I guess I really shouldn’t complain about this kind of busy…but it’s my excuse for not writing more.

I had planned to post this photo today…and then I saw that Iris beat me to it and already has it on her blog. Go check it out there too. Iris writes a great blog that you should be reading…and she posts lots of wonderful nudes of herself. There’s a link over to the right. Thanks, Iris, for all those kind words about me.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

Still Busy

February 6th, 2007

Sorry that I still can’t find time to write much here. Just too much going on. Today I have to edit the shoot I did for a magazine yesterday and get the selected shots e-mailed off to the magazine for them to do their editing. This morning I did a shoot with Gaea, who, along with her boyfriend, will be going up to the Dirty Show with me on Friday. And, of course, it’s freaking cold and it’s supposed to snow a ton tonight. Another storm of the century of the week. I’d stay home tomorrow, but I have to go out and get another medical test done…the last, I hope. All is well, in case anyone was concerned…all tests have come back normal…which is pretty weird for a guy like me.

Anyway…when I went up to Detroit on Sunday to drop off prints for the Dirty Show I also did a shoot with Iris in a formerly magestic, now very seedy hotel in downtown Detroit. Here’s one from that shoot. Lots more to come. Thanks Iris. Gaea and company and I will be staying in this same hotel this weekend when we go up for the Dirty Show, so we’ll probably make some more photos there then. And I’ll soon post more of Iris and some of what I shot this morning. But for now, it’s back to the work that pays the rent.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

It’s a busy life

February 3rd, 2007

The next few days are very busy, so you’ll be spared any new rambling rants from me for a few days. Tomorrow I drive to Detroit to drop off my and Gary Mitchell’s prints for the Dirty Show which opens next weekend. While I’m up there I’ll also be doing a shoot with Iris. Then on Monday I have a commercial shoot for a magazine at my studio. Tuesday I’ll be doing a shoot with Gaea, who is the model in the photo that I’ll be showing at the Dirty Show.

I’ll probably do some new posts here while all that is going on, but they will be short ones. Maybe I’ll have some new photos to share with you after all that shooting.

For now, here’s another fishnet figure study. Just something to change things a bit while working in the studio in all this bitter cold weather.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

The History of Photography, Part I

February 1st, 2007

With apologies to Mel Brooks.

I’m afraid I’m somewhat puzzled and amused by the heated reaction on the part of some photographers to the rise of digital photography and the decline in popularity of the silver process. To me it’s just another step in the constant development of the medium. But there are a few remarkable differences in this newest change in technology which make it a much better change than most of the ones we’ve had in the past. I want to review the progress of the medium over the centuries to make my point.

Of course, cameras (the camera obscura, first discovered when pinholes in tent fabric would project an upside down image of the outside on the wall of a tent in the desert) were around for at least 1,000 years before anyone came up with a way to preserve the image they formed. That was the secret of photography. It’s the only secret of photography, and it was revealed more than 160 years ago.

The first successful photographic process to produce permanent images was, of course, invented by Daguerre who was building on the discoveries of his partner, Niepce. It was essentially a silver process using iodine to sensitize a polished silver plate. Mercury vapor was the developer and common salt was the “fixer” which desensitized the silver.

This was a difficult and dangerous process. Many photographers died from exposure to mercury vapor. The resulting image, as we all know, was difficult to view. But it was remarkable for the high quality of the images. We know Daguerreotypes are quite permanent because many made in the first half of the 19th century are still with us.

Why aren’t we still using that process? It worked quite well, despite a few disadvantages. The silver plates were certainly more durable than the paper we produce photos on now.

Well, there have been many other photographic processes invented over the years. Talbot invented a paper-based process at about the same time as Daguerre came up with his. It was Herschel who first used what was then called hyposulphite of soda to remove the unexposed silver from his photographs. That chemical, now called sodium thiosulfate, but which we all call “hypo,” remains a basic ingredient of the chemical process to this day.

There have been many other processes invented and used over the history of photography. Talbot’s calotype was an improvement on his original process. Then the collodion process (sometimes called “wet plate”) replaced Talbot’s, using glass plate negatives. This became the process of choice. It is still used today by some photographers. This was Matthew Brady’s process. It was slow and difficult, but produced photographs of excellent quality.

OK…to keep this from getting too long (oops, too late) I’ll stop describing each process and just list a few of those that followed. For quite a few years these were just printing processes using collodion negatives: Carbon prints, Carbro prints, tin types, ambrotypes, carte-de-visite. By the 1880s dry plates replaced the wet plate process. Soon the inventions of electric light and fast printing papers allowed the beginning of mass produced photo prints. The hand-coated wet plate negative was finished.

Then George Eastman came along. Glass plates were replaced by flexible plastic film. Mass produced simple cameras and mass photo finishing made photography a common activity. The basic negative/positive silver process that is still in use today was now in place…more than a century ago.

There are, of course, a lot of other processes that can produce photographs. Gum bichromate, platinum, gold…any precious metal will work. Why did we settle on silver? Speed, ease and cost were the basic reasons. Not quality. In fact, most advances in the process of photography have sacrificed quality for a process that was easier, safer and faster.

So now I come to my point at last. The current move to digital photography is different. It is different because it is not sacrificing quality. The digital process is easier, faster, safer (it introduces less toxic chemicals into the environment…and into the bodies of darkroom workers). And the quality is now higher than what is attainable with the silver process. The sensors in the latest professional digital cameras have greater resolving power than the lenses used on the cameras can deliver. The d-max attainable with the latest pigment ink jet printers is blacker than can be achieved using a silver process. The ability to control tones in a print through computer software is vastly greater than what can be done while making a silver enlargement, even by the most skilled darkroom technician. Pigment ink jet prints have greater permanence than chemical color prints and approach the permanence of black and white silver prints.

Photography is not a religion. From listening to some bemoan the change to digital you’d think there was something holy involved. Photographs can certainly capture the holy. But how it is captured doesn’t matter. It’s just a process. The process has changed many times over the years, often for the worse in terms of quality. This change is at least one that offers higher quality. And all I really care about is the photographs. I want to share my vision of the world and I want to see what you have to share of your vision. I don’t really care about the process used to record the photos. Whatever works is fine with me. Digital works. So does silver. Use what you like. But show me the photos.

References for this post were The History of Photography by Beaumont Newhall and A Popular Treatise on the Art of Photography written by Robert Hunt and first published in 1841, edited by James Y. Tong and reprinted in 1973.

Today’s photo continues my red and black theme. Photographed with a digital camera using a lighting setup that has been used by photographers almost since the beginning of the medium.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

Red on Black

January 31st, 2007

Put together a black fishnet body stocking and a true red head, add a little classic figure lighting in the studio…

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

Paparazzi

January 30th, 2007

Where do paparazzi fit in to the discussion of photographer’s rights and access? Are they news photographers? I’m not so sure I have the answer to that question. But I can tell you that I have absolutely no interest in their subject matter or the photos they produce. I’m frankly appalled by all the attention our society pays to the private lives of a few celebrities, some of whom are famous only for being famous. Just a diversion from the issues that deserve our attention. Bread and circuses. So we get the celebrity circus, courtesy of a group of photographers.

There is no doubt that the celebrities need the paparazzi as much as the paparazzi need the celebrities. It’s a fairly transparent little dance for attention that we see going on all the time. A lot of theater, but sometimes some real damage, even death. And for what? Some more publicity to boost a movie or TV show. A big payday for that embarrassing photo when a celebrity looks pretty much like the rest of us? All, once again, a diversion from anything that matters.

Are any of you watching “Dirt”? I’m a fan of Courtney Cox, so I started watching it from the beginning. (And, when I say fan what that means to me is that I think she is a fairly talented actress in addition to being a beautiful woman…I have no interest in her private life, just her professional career and work as an actress.) I’m enjoying the show. Check it out, if for no other reason than to watch the schizophrenic photographer who is a central character.

You have to wonder if this serious nut job paparazzi character was created as a form of revenge on the paparazzi who have imposed on Courtney Cox and her family and friends over the years. But then, photographers are usually portrayed as pretty weird individuals on TV. Anyone remember Animal on Lou Grant?

But photographers tend to be a little bit different, don’t we? I’ve often noticed at photo conferences that there tend to be significantly more beards in attendance than would be the case with a random sample of the general population. It’s also very common to find a motorcycle parked in a photographer’s garage. I suppose it has something to do with “right brain thinking” and not a little with the nature of the work we do. We have to be there when it happens. You can write at a computer terminal back at the office. But you can’t get photos that way. Being out there in the world seeing what is happening…and doing it on your own…that’s what originally drew me to become a photographer. That and the naked women.

Here’s a softer vision of the beautiful naked Nola, courtesy of my old single-element soft-focus lens.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

2007 Calendars

January 30th, 2007

It’s almost the end of January which means I’ll be removing my 2007 calendars from distribution soon. So if you still want to get a calendar, better hurry or they’ll be gone. You can see and order them here: http://www.lulu.com/Wayward

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

More Nola

January 29th, 2007

I hope you aren’t getting tired of Nola. I know I’m not. Every time I go back to those photos I find more that I love. Here’s another one.

After spending the first half of today going through a fairly unpleasant medical test, I’m not really feeling like writing a long essay today. Maybe tomorrow I’ll be up to more verbal diarea. Or not. For now, just enjoy Nola.

I have a very busy week coming up, including more medical tests, but also a couple possible shoots, so I hope to have some new things to share here soon.

Uncategorized | No Comments | Trackback

2026 Calendars

Calendars are now available for 2026. You can see them and order your copies here:

https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/wayward

About this Blog

Photos and comments by Dave Levingston. This is the place to see my most recent work which may include nudes, dance, landscape, nature and whatever other kinds of photos I feel like taking.

Since it does contain nude photos, this blog is not intended for viewing by anyone under the age of 18.

All photographs and written comments on this blog are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.


2009 ARTS FOR HUMANITY AWARD

Presented by Carrie Leigh's NUDE Magazine. Award design by Lin and Rich of fluffytek and A. J. Kahn.

2008 GOLDEN FLUFFY
Best Blog Image of the Year

About Dave

Photo by Katherine Villari

Dave on the Web

Blogroll

Search Archives

Archives

Tags

Categories

Navigation Menu